<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Libertarian Ramblings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://somefreethoughts.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://somefreethoughts.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:59:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s happening with LR by sandrar</title>
		<link>http://somefreethoughts.wordpress.com/whats-happening-with-lr/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>sandrar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somefreethoughts.wordpress.com/?page_id=14#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post... nice! I love your blog.  :) Cheers! Sandra. R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post&#8230; nice! I love your blog.  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Cheers! Sandra. R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Abortion: A libertarian perspective by Katie</title>
		<link>http://somefreethoughts.wordpress.com/2008/06/17/abortion-a-libertarian-perspective/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 18:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somefreethoughts.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-50</guid>
		<description>I am so pro-choice it&#039;s ridiculous. However, I have apparently different reasons than you because I feel like a logical consequence to your argument is that it&#039;s ok for women to abandon their babies in trash cans because a newborn baby is still dependent upon parental care for survival. Explain why this is not a logical consequence of your argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so pro-choice it&#8217;s ridiculous. However, I have apparently different reasons than you because I feel like a logical consequence to your argument is that it&#8217;s ok for women to abandon their babies in trash cans because a newborn baby is still dependent upon parental care for survival. Explain why this is not a logical consequence of your argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Taxes aren&#8217;t the issue by The circularity of bailout money &#171; Libertarian Ramblings</title>
		<link>http://somefreethoughts.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/taxes-arent-the-issue/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>The circularity of bailout money &#171; Libertarian Ramblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somefreethoughts.wordpress.com/?p=43#comment-45</guid>
		<description>[...] Recent Comments Rich on An abortion&#160;dilemma?An abortion dilemma?&#8230; on Consistent&#160;ideologyWhy Obama doesn&#8230; on Real&#160;ChangeConsistent ideology &#8230; on Abortion: A libertarian&#160;p&#8230;Landfill on Taxes aren&#8217;t the&#160;is&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recent Comments Rich on An abortion&nbsp;dilemma?An abortion dilemma?&hellip; on Consistent&nbsp;ideologyWhy Obama doesn&hellip; on Real&nbsp;ChangeConsistent ideology &hellip; on Abortion: A libertarian&nbsp;p&hellip;Landfill on Taxes aren&#8217;t the&nbsp;is&hellip; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An abortion dilemma? by Rich</title>
		<link>http://somefreethoughts.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/an-abortion-dilemma/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somefreethoughts.wordpress.com/?p=52#comment-44</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not even appalled by the actions of the doctor or the pharmacist.  People have a right to live by their beliefs.  People also have a right, having been refused the treatment of their choice by one service provider, to go elsewhere.

I say it&#039;s all good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not even appalled by the actions of the doctor or the pharmacist.  People have a right to live by their beliefs.  People also have a right, having been refused the treatment of their choice by one service provider, to go elsewhere.</p>
<p>I say it&#8217;s all good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Consistent ideology by An abortion dilemma? &#171; Libertarian Ramblings</title>
		<link>http://somefreethoughts.wordpress.com/2008/11/27/consistent-ideology/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>An abortion dilemma? &#171; Libertarian Ramblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 01:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somefreethoughts.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-43</guid>
		<description>[...] Consistent&#160;ideology [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Consistent&nbsp;ideology [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Real Change by Why Obama doesn&#8217;t get it &#171; Libertarian Ramblings</title>
		<link>http://somefreethoughts.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/real-change/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Obama doesn&#8217;t get it &#171; Libertarian Ramblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 08:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somefreethoughts.wordpress.com/?p=6#comment-42</guid>
		<description>[...] Posts Consistent ideologyWhy Obama doesn&#039;t get itTaxes aren&#039;t the issueReal ChangeLet&#039;s keep marriage the way it&#039;s supposed to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posts Consistent ideologyWhy Obama doesn&#8217;t get itTaxes aren&#8217;t the issueReal ChangeLet&#8217;s keep marriage the way it&#8217;s supposed to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Abortion: A libertarian perspective by Consistent ideology &#171; Libertarian Ramblings</title>
		<link>http://somefreethoughts.wordpress.com/2008/06/17/abortion-a-libertarian-perspective/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Consistent ideology &#171; Libertarian Ramblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 23:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somefreethoughts.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-41</guid>
		<description>[...] a half ago, I was crushed because I thought it was a deal-breaker since I may be the most hard-core Pro-Choice supporter in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a half ago, I was crushed because I thought it was a deal-breaker since I may be the most hard-core Pro-Choice supporter in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Taxes aren&#8217;t the issue by Landfill</title>
		<link>http://somefreethoughts.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/taxes-arent-the-issue/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Landfill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somefreethoughts.wordpress.com/?p=43#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Thank you! Someone else actually gets it! Great article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you! Someone else actually gets it! Great article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Obama doesn&#8217;t get it by gravisman</title>
		<link>http://somefreethoughts.wordpress.com/2008/11/06/why-obama-doesnt-get-it/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>gravisman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somefreethoughts.wordpress.com/?p=41#comment-39</guid>
		<description>1. Pay inequality. Recall that I said the difference between the first 3 and the last item is that the first three don&#039;t involve people&#039;s relationship with the government, which is precisely what civil rights are all about. This can be considered a social problem, but it&#039;s not a civil liberties problem, and there&#039;s no reason for it to be a government problem. If people are being under-paid, then market will respond to that with open opportunities. Don&#039;t go knocking on the government&#039;s door demanding it tell your employer to pay you more.

2. Criminal justice. This issue I actually acknowledged in my post as a legitimate civil rights issue. I agree with you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Pay inequality. Recall that I said the difference between the first 3 and the last item is that the first three don&#8217;t involve people&#8217;s relationship with the government, which is precisely what civil rights are all about. This can be considered a social problem, but it&#8217;s not a civil liberties problem, and there&#8217;s no reason for it to be a government problem. If people are being under-paid, then market will respond to that with open opportunities. Don&#8217;t go knocking on the government&#8217;s door demanding it tell your employer to pay you more.</p>
<p>2. Criminal justice. This issue I actually acknowledged in my post as a legitimate civil rights issue. I agree with you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Obama doesn&#8217;t get it by Seeker</title>
		<link>http://somefreethoughts.wordpress.com/2008/11/06/why-obama-doesnt-get-it/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Seeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somefreethoughts.wordpress.com/?p=41#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I think you make a valid point about the issues of labeling civil liberties as &quot;the problem&quot; without specifying its nature and that forcing it to change is not ideal. 

When it comes to pay inequity the fine line is that black men are payed less than white women that are payed less than white men of the same educational background and relative history. This isn&#039;t to illustrate that pay gradients should vary, but that the difference in pay is based on what the company deems they can get away with paying a woman who &quot;may&quot; at sometime chose to have a family and thus is assumed to be less capable.  Thats sexism as it assumes a woman&#039;s role even if she is unmarried or married and not planning to have kids or planning on the husband having them.  

Criminal justice inequities are tied from the most basic tendency of police profiling which considering the number of white drivers that speed versus black drivers and the number that get pulled over and receive a ticket, it illustrates that its not merely who breaks the law but it dealing out the punishment.  Also, for crimes of the same severity African americans often get harsher penalties such that a white man will recieve life and a black man will be put on death row.  

I commend your desire in trying to put these issues in perspective, but I don&#039;t think you are accurately perceiving what it is about these problems that make them civil inequities and why they are government based concerns. I suspect you&#039;ll reach your own conclusions, regardless, but I fear that you may have been the victim of disinformation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you make a valid point about the issues of labeling civil liberties as &#8220;the problem&#8221; without specifying its nature and that forcing it to change is not ideal. </p>
<p>When it comes to pay inequity the fine line is that black men are payed less than white women that are payed less than white men of the same educational background and relative history. This isn&#8217;t to illustrate that pay gradients should vary, but that the difference in pay is based on what the company deems they can get away with paying a woman who &#8220;may&#8221; at sometime chose to have a family and thus is assumed to be less capable.  Thats sexism as it assumes a woman&#8217;s role even if she is unmarried or married and not planning to have kids or planning on the husband having them.  </p>
<p>Criminal justice inequities are tied from the most basic tendency of police profiling which considering the number of white drivers that speed versus black drivers and the number that get pulled over and receive a ticket, it illustrates that its not merely who breaks the law but it dealing out the punishment.  Also, for crimes of the same severity African americans often get harsher penalties such that a white man will recieve life and a black man will be put on death row.  </p>
<p>I commend your desire in trying to put these issues in perspective, but I don&#8217;t think you are accurately perceiving what it is about these problems that make them civil inequities and why they are government based concerns. I suspect you&#8217;ll reach your own conclusions, regardless, but I fear that you may have been the victim of disinformation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
